But what if it’s not fine? Even back in 1996, before a single component of the ISS was launched into orbit, NASA foresaw the possibility of an even worse worst-case scenario: an uncontrolled reentry. The crux of this scenario involves multiple systems failing in an improbable but not completely impossible cascade. Cabin depressurization could damage the avionics. The electrical power system could go offline, along with thermal control and data handling. Without these, systems controlling coolant and even propellant could break down. Unmoored, the ISS would edge slowly toward Earth, maybe over a year or two, with no way to control where it is headed or where its debris might land. And no, we could not save ourselves by blowing the station up. This would be extremely dangerous and almost certainly create an enormous amount of space trash—which is how we got into this hypothetical mess in the first place.
本文逐一拆解a16z这三份报告的核心判断，以及这些判断背后，钱正在往哪里流。
，详情可参考搜狗输入法下载
Option A: Open an Issue (easiest)，详情可参考WPS官方版本下载
公司首席科学家 Jared Kaplan 在接受采访时表示，在竞争对手快速推进的情况下，单方面停止训练 AI 模型「对任何人都没好处」。
"It's the early days and they're still showing this in small numbers at the moment.